imfreedom/www.imfreedom.org

Fix a bunch of stuff found in review

2020-04-30, Gary Kramlich
40088968a475
Parents 8c189aa78f02
Children 667ddb1fa293
Fix a bunch of stuff found in review
--- a/hugo/content/minutes/2020-04-22.md Thu Apr 30 05:22:07 2020 -0500
+++ b/hugo/content/minutes/2020-04-22.md Thu Apr 30 19:50:37 2020 -0500
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
IM Freedom Board Meeting 2020-04-22 00:00 UTC using Zoom.us. All time listed
below in UTC.
-* Preamble and call to order: 03:14
+* Preamble and call to order: 00:14
* Directors Present
* John Baily, President/Treasure
* Matthew Needham, Vice President
@@ -35,7 +35,7 @@
* We will meet the cut off date for Bitbucket.org.
* Our Kubernetes cluster has been sponsored by Digital Ocean.
* Trac and the IMF wiki have yet to migrate.
- * Email will be moved to our nicobar VPS once Trac has been migrated.
+ * Email will be moved to our nicobar host once Trac has been migrated.
* Gary created a new Mercurial hosting tool named HGKeeper.
* Retired planet.pidgin.im
* Trac is going to move to issues.imfreedom.org.
@@ -239,7 +239,7 @@
IMF to support the infrastructure.
* Ethan states that that is our primary charter.
* Gary mentions that Adium's project status, while difficult at the
- moment that more or less they're code is still in Mercurial as
+ moment that more or less their code is still in Mercurial as
well. And that to say that this is just Pidgin is a bit short
sighted.
* Richard asks if Gary isn't involved and if IM Freedom was paying
@@ -248,7 +248,7 @@
* Both Ethan and Richard agree.
* Ethan states that if we could have thrown some money at Bitbucket
to stay there then we would have.
- * Ethan states that while their is a conflict of interest specter,
+ * Ethan states that while their is a conflict of interest spectre,
and that's why we previously wanted a proposal and so on. But it's
also not just HGKeeper that we're talking about, it's the lion's
share of the maintenance of our infrastructure for a couple of
@@ -275,7 +275,7 @@
concern.
* John points out that if we were to go out and contract this work from
an external party it would cost us a significant amount more and that
- we would most likely have on going fees.
+ we would most likely have ongoing fees.
* Ethan points out that Gary did all of this without expectation of
reimbursement.
* John says that at this point, he believes this discussion has absolved
@@ -292,7 +292,8 @@
* Ethan states that if Gary had not continued to push on Pidgin
specifically there would have been no development on Pidgin in the past
5 years and while the project may not be where any of us hoped it would
- be including Gary, if he hadn't been pushing it it would have died.
+ be including Gary, if he hadn't been pushing it, the project would have
+ died.
* Ethan continues that what we're not just paying arrears from the last
meeting, but instead it's for a span of time that goes back for half
a decade.
@@ -306,7 +307,7 @@
Particularly since we have the precedent of spending this size of
our war chest for an arguably less critical infrastructure in the past.
* Peter is rather pissed at Gary for not writing the proposal last year,
- and that in the future we need proposals in the future.
+ and that in the future we need proposals.
* Ethan points out that we most likely can't do this again in the future,
unless we get more income.
* Peter points out that this is a special circumstance and that since
@@ -376,12 +377,12 @@
* Peter mentions that due to the pandemic that the person doing the
work is in need of a job and that that is the reason behind it and
that it's not about setting a precedent.
- * Ethan agrees with Peter but is concern with precedent and that
+ * Ethan agrees with Peter but is concerned with precedent and that
it was Gary's decision to make this his primary work and it is not
the responsibility of the board. That said, all of the other
infrastructure work that Ethan, John, Richard, etc have been doing
wouldn't have happened if the project wasn't alive and that there's
- only person that has kept the project alive.
+ only one person that has kept the project alive.
* Ethan states that going back to the precedent question, it has
to be made clear that this not a thing we can frequently do and
that this is potentially opening the door to using our war chest to
@@ -405,8 +406,8 @@
* Peter makes a motion that the value should be $5,000 USD.
* Matthew seconds
* Passes unanimously
- * Ethan mentions that we simply afford to do this again unless we decide
- we're closing the organization or find additional income.
+ * Ethan mentions that we simply can't afford to do this again unless we
+ decide we're closing the organization or find additional income.
* Peter mentions that there would need to be a written proposal.
* John and Ethan agree.
*** Gary rejoins the call ***
@@ -416,10 +417,10 @@
income to do this again.
* Gary thanks everyone for their generosity and asks a few questions
about taxes.
- * It is determine that John should be the one to write the check, but
+ * It is determined that John should be the one to write the check, but
Matthew is capable as well. Ethan says he can look it up online.
* Ethan makes a mention to conclude the meeting
* Gary seconds
* Passes unanimously
-* Meeting ends at 5:25
+* Meeting ends at 02:25